--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- NA --
Front Matter
Title Page and Credits
THE FIRE NEXT TIME
James Baldwin
THE MODERN LIBRARY
NEW YORK
-- NA --
1995 Modern Library Edition
Biographical Note copyright © 1995 by Random House, Inc. Copyright © 1962, 1963 by James Baldwin Copyright renewed 1990, 1991 by Gloria Baldwin Karefa-Smart
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Random House, Inc., New York, and simultaneously in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto.
Down at the Cross originally appeared in The New Yorker as Letter from a Region in My Mind.
My Dungeon Shook originally appeared in The Progressive.
Reprinted by arrangement with The Estate of James Baldwin.
Jacket photograph courtesy of Archive Photos.
Printed on recycled, acid-free paper
Manufactured in the United States of America
246897531
-- NA --
for James James Luc James
-- NA --
"God gave Noah the rainbow sign,
No more water, the fire next time!"
-- NA --
Contents
My Dungeon Shook: Letter to My Nephew on the One Hundredth Anniversary of the
Emancipation 1
Down At The Cross: Letter from a Region in My Mind 13
-- NA --
Body
My Dungeon Shook: Letter to My Nephew on the One Hundredth Anniversary of the
Emancipation
-- 3 --
Dear James:
I HAVE BEGUN this letter five times and torn it up five times. I keep seeing your face, which is also the face of your father and my brother. Like him, you are tough, dark, vulnerable, moody -- with a very definite tendency to sound truculent because you want no one to think you are soft. You may be like your grandfather in this, I don't know, but certainly both you and your father resemble him very much physically. Well, he is dead, he never saw you, and he had a terrible life; he was defeated long before he died because, at the bottom of his heart, he really believed what white people said about him. This is one of the reasons that he became so holy. I am sure that your father has told you something about all that. Neither you nor your father exhibit any tendency towards holiness:
-- 4 --
you really are of another era, part of what happened when the Negro left the
land and came into what the late E. Franklin Frazier called "the cities
of destruction." You can only be destroyed by believing that you really
are what the white world calls a nigger. I tell you this because I love you,
and please don't you ever forget it.
I have known both of you all your lives, have carried your Daddy in my arms and on my shoulders, kissed and spanked him and watched him learn to walk. I don't know if you've known anybody from that far back; if you've loved anybody that long, first as an infant, then as a child, then as a man, you gain a strange perspective on time and human pain and effort. Other people cannot see what I see whenever I look into your father's face, for behind your father's face as it is today are all those other faces which were his. Let him laugh and I see a cellar your father does not remember and a house he does not remember and I hear in his present laughter his laughter as a child. Let him curse and I remember him falling down the cellar steps, and howling, and I remember, with pain, his tears, which my hand or your grandmother's so easily wiped away. But no one's hand can wipe away those tears he sheds invisibly today, which one hears in his laughter and in his speech and in his songs. I
-- 5 --
know what the world has done to my brother and how narrowly he has survived
it. And I know, which is much worse, and this is the crime of which I accuse
my country and my countrymen, and for which neither I nor time nor history will
ever forgive them, that they have destroyed and are destroying hundreds of thousands
of lives and do not know it and do not want to know it. One can be, indeed one
must strive to become, tough and philosophical concerning destruction and death,
for this is what most of mankind has been best at since we have heard of man.
(But remember: most of mankind is not all of mankind.) But it is not permissible
that the authors of devastation should also be innocent. It is the innocence
which constitutes the crime.
Now, my dear namesake, these innocent and well-meaning people, your countrymen, have caused you to be born under conditions not very far removed from those described for us by Charles Dickens in the London of more than a hundred years ago. (I hear the chorus of the innocents screaming, "No! This is not true! How bitter you are!" -- but I am writing this letter to you, to try to tell you something about how to handle them, for most of them do not yet really know that you exist. I know the conditions under which you were born, for I was there. Your countrymen were not
-- 6 --
there, and haven't made it yet. Your grandmother was also there, and no one
has ever accused her of being bitter. I suggest that the innocents check with
her. She isn't hard to find. Your countrymen don't know that she exists, either,
though she has been working for them all their lives.)
Well, you were born, here you came, something like fifteen years ago; and though your father and mother and grandmother, looking about the streets through which they were carrying you, staring at the walls into which they brought you, had every reason to be heavyhearted, yet they were not. For here you were, Big James, named for me -- you were a big baby, I was not -- here you were: to be loved. To be loved, baby, hard, at once, and forever, to strengthen you against the loveless world. Remember that: I know how black it looks today, for you. It looked bad that day, too, yes, we were trembling. We have not stopped trembling yet, but if we had not loved each other none of us would have survived. And now you must survive because we love you, and for the sake of your children and your children's children.
This innocent country set you down in a ghetto in which, in fact, it intended that you should perish. Let me spell out precisely what I mean by that, for the heart of the matter is here, and the root of my dispute
-- 7 --
with my country. You were born where you were born and faced the future that
you faced because you were black and for no other reason. The limits of your
ambition were, thus, expected to be set forever. You were born into a society
which spelled out with brutal clarity, and in as many ways as possible, that
you were a worthless human being. You were not expected to aspire to excellence:
you were expected to make peace with mediocrity. Wherever you have turned, James,
in your short time on this earth, you have been told where you could go and
what you could do (and how you could do it) and where you could live and whom
you could marry. I know your countrymen do not agree with me about this, and
I hear them saying, "You exaggerate." They do not know Harlem, and
I do. So do you. Take no one's word for anything, including mine -- but trust
your experience. Know whence you came. If you know whence you came, there is
really no limit to where you can go. The details and symbols of your life have
been deliberately constructed to make you believe what white people say about
you. Please try to remember that what they believe, as well as what they do
and cause you to endure, does not testify to your inferiority but to their inhumanity
and fear. Please try to be clear, dear James, through the storm which
-- 8 --
rages about your youthful head today, about the reality which lies behind the
words acceptance and integration. There is no reason for you to try to become
like white people and there is no basis whatever for their impertinent assumption
that they must accept you. The really terrible thing, old buddy, is that you
must accept them. And I mean that very seriously. You must accept them and accept
them with love. For these innocent people have no other hope. They are, in effect,
still trapped in a history which they do not understand; and until they understand
it, they cannot be released from it. They have had to believe for many years,
and for innumerable reasons, that black men are inferior to white men. Many
of them, indeed, know better, but, as you will discover, people find it very
difficult to act on what they know. To act is to be committed, and to be committed
is to be in danger. In this case, the danger, in the minds of most white Americans,
is the loss of their identity. Try to imagine how you would feel if you woke
up one morning to find the sun shining and all the stars aflame. You would be
frightened because it is out of the order of nature. Any upheaval in the universe
is terrifying because it so profoundly attacks one's sense of one's own reality.
Well, the black man has functioned in the white man's world as a fixed star,
as an immovable
-- 9 --
pillar: and as he moves out of his place, heaven and earth are shaken to their
foundations. You, don't be afraid. I said that it was intended that you should
perish in the ghetto, perish by never being allowed to go behind the white man's
definitions, by never being allowed to spell your proper name. You have, and
many of us have, defeated this intention; and, by a terrible law, a terrible
paradox, those innocents who believed that your imprisonment made them safe
are losing their grasp of reality. But these men are your brothers -- your lost,
younger brothers. And if the word integration means anything, this is what it
means: that we, with love, shall force our brothers to see themselves as they
are, to cease fleeing from reality and begin to change it. For this is your
home, my friend, do not be driven from it; great men have done great things
here, and will again, and we can make America what America must become. It will
be hard, James, but you come from sturdy, peasant stock, men who picked cotton
and dammed rivers and built railroads, and, in the teeth of the most terrifying
odds, achieved an unassailable and monumental dignity. You come from a long
line of great poets, some of the greatest poets since Homer. One of them said,
The very time I thought I was lost, My dungeon shook and my chains fell off.
-- 10 --
You know, and I know, that the country is celebrating one hundred years of freedom one hundred years too soon. We cannot be free until they are free. God bless you, James, and Godspeed.
Your uncle,
James
-- NA --
Take up the White Man's burden --
Ye dare not stoop to less --
Nor call too loud on Freedom
To cloak your weariness;
By all ye cry or whisper,
By all ye leave or do,
The silent, sullen peoples
Shall weigh your Gods and you.
-- Kipling
Down at the cross where my Saviour died,
Down where for cleansing from sin I cried,
There to my heart was the blood applied,
Singing glory to His name!
-- Hymn
-- NA --
Down At The Cross: Letter from a Region in My Mind
-- 15 --
I UNDERWENT, during the summer that I became fourteen, a prolonged religious crisis. I use the word "religious" in the common, and arbitrary, sense, meaning that I then discovered God, His saints and angels, and His blazing Hell. And since I had been born in a Christian nation, I accepted this Deity as the only one. I supposed Him to exist only within the walls of a church -- in fact, of our church -- and I also supposed that God and safety were synonymous. The word "safety" brings us to the real meaning of the word "religious" as we use it. Therefore, to state it in another, more accurate way, I became, during my fourteenth year, for the first time in my life, afraid -- afraid of the evil within me and afraid of the evil without. What I saw around me that summer in Harlem was what I had always seen; nothing had
-- 16 --
changed. But now, without any warning, the whores and pimps and racketeers on
the Avenue had become a personal menace. It had not before occurred to me that
I could become one of them, but now I realized that we had been produced by
the same circumstances. Many of my comrades were clearly headed for the Avenue,
and my father said that I was headed that way, too. My friends began to drink
and smoke, and embarked -- at first avid, then groaning -- on their sexual careers.
Girls, only slightly older than I was, who sang in the choir or taught Sunday
school, the children of holy parents, underwent, before my eyes, their incredible
metamorphosis, of which the most bewildering aspect was not their budding breasts
or their rounding behinds but something deeper and more subtle, in their eyes,
their heat, their odor, and the inflection of their voices. Like the strangers
on the Avenue, they became, in the twinkling of an eye, unutterably different
and fantastically present. Owing to the way I had been raised, the abrupt discomfort
that all this aroused in me and the fact that I had no idea what my voice or
my mind or my body was likely to do next caused me to consider myself one of
the most depraved people on earth. Matters were not helped by the fact that
these holy girls seemed rather to enjoy my terrified lapses, our grim, guilty,
tormented
-- 17 --
experiments, which were at once as chill and joyless as the Russian steppes
and hotter, by far, than all the fires of Hell.
Yet there was something deeper than these changes, and less definable, that frightened me. It was real in both the boys and the girls, but it was, somehow, more vivid in the boys. In the case of the girls, one watched them turning into matrons before they had become women. They began to manifest a curious and really rather terrifying single-mindedness. It is hard to say exactly how this was conveyed: something implacable in the set of the lips, something far-seeing (seeing what?) in the eyes, some new and crushing determination in the walk, something peremptory in the voice. They did not tease us, the boys, any more; they reprimanded us sharply, saying, "You better be thinking about your soul!" For the girls also saw the evidence on the Avenue, knew what the price would be, for them, of one misstep, knew that they had to be protected and that we were the only protection there was. They understood that they must act as God's decoys, saving the souls of the boys for Jesus and binding the bodies of the boys in marriage. For this was the beginning of our burning time, and "It is better," said St. Paul -- who elsewhere, with a most unusual and stunning exactness, described himself as
-- 18 --
a "wretched man" -- "to marry than to burn." And I began
to feel in the boys a curious, wary, bewildered despair, as though they were
now settling in for the long, hard winter of life. I did not know then what
it was that I was reacting to; I put it to myself that they were letting themselves
go. In the same way that the girls were destined to gain as much weight as their
mothers, the boys, it was clear, would rise no higher than their fathers. School
began to reveal itself, therefore, as a child's game that one could not win,
and boys dropped out of school and went to work. My father wanted me to do the
same. I refused, even though I no longer had any illusions about what an education
could do for me; I had already encountered too many college-graduate handymen.
My friends were now "downtown," busy, as they put it, "fighting
the man." They began to care less about the way they looked, the way they
dressed, the things they did; presently, one found them in twos and threes and
fours, in a hallway, sharing a jug of wine or a bottle of whiskey, talking,
cursing, fighting, sometimes weeping: lost, and unable to say what it was that
oppressed them, except that they knew it was "the man" -- the white
man. And there seemed to be no way whatever to remove this cloud that stood
between them and the sun, between them and love and
-- 19 --
life and power, between them and whatever it was that they wanted. One did not
have to be very bright to realize how little one could do to change one's situation;
one did not have to be abnormally sensitive to be worn down to a cutting edge
by the incessant and gratuitous humiliation and danger one encountered every
working day, all day long. The humiliation did not apply merely to working days,
or workers; I was thirteen and was crossing Fifth Avenue on my way to the Forty-second
Street library, and the cop in the middle of the street muttered as I passed
him, "Why don't you niggers stay uptown where you belong?" When I
was ten, and didn't look, certainly, any older, two policemen amused themselves
with me by frisking me, making comic (and terrifying) speculations concerning
my ancestry and probable sexual prowess, and for good measure, leaving me flat
on my back in one of Harlem's empty lots. Just before and then during the Second
World War, many of my friends fled into the service, all to be changed there,
and rarely for the better, many to be ruined, and many to die. Others fled to
other states and cities -- that is, to other ghettos. Some went on wine or whiskey
or the needle, and are still on it. And others, like me, fled into the church.
For the wages of sin were visible everywhere, in
-- 20 --
every wine-stained and urine-splashed hallway, in every clanging ambulance bell,
in every scar on the faces of the pimps and their whores, in every helpless,
newborn baby being brought into this danger, in every knife and pistol fight
on the Avenue, and in every disastrous bulletin: a cousin, mother of six, suddenly
gone mad, the children parcelled out here and there; an indestructible aunt
rewarded for years of hard labor by a slow, agonizing death in a terrible small
room; someone's bright son blown into eternity by his own hand; another turned
robber and carried off to jail. It was a summer of dreadful speculations and
discoveries, of which these were not the worst. Crime became real, for example
-- for the first time -- not as a possibility but as the possibility. One would
never defeat one's circumstances by working and saving one's pennies; one would
never, by working, acquire that many pennies, and, besides, the social treatment
accorded even the most successful Negroes proved that one needed, in order to
be free, something more than a bank account. One needed a handle, a lever, a
means of inspiring fear. It was absolutely clear that the police would whip
you and take you in as long as they could get away with it, and that everyone
else -- housewives, taxi-drivers, elevator boys, dishwashers, bartenders, lawyers,
judges,
-- 21 --
doctors, and grocers -- would never, by the operation of any generous human
feeling, cease to use you as an outlet for his frustrations and hostilities.
Neither civilized reason nor Christian love would cause any of those people
to treat you as they presumably wanted to be treated; only the fear of your
power to retaliate would cause them to do that, or to seem to do it, which was
(and is) good enough. There appears to be a vast amount of confusion on this
point, but I do not know many Negroes who are eager to be "accepted"
by white people, still less to be loved by them; they, the blacks, simply don't
wish to be beaten over the head by the whites every instant of our brief passage
on this planet. White people in this country will have quite enough to do in
learning how to accept and love themselves and each other, and when they have
achieved this -- which will not be tomorrow and may very well be never -- the
Negro problem will no longer exist, for it will no longer be needed.
People more advantageously placed than we in Harlem were, and are, will no doubt find the psychology and the view of human nature sketched above dismal and shocking in the extreme. But the Negro's experience of the white world cannot possibly create in him any respect for the standards by which the white world claims to live. His own condition is overwhelming
-- 22 --
proof that white people do not live by these standards. Negro servants have
been smuggling odds and ends out of white homes for generations, and white people
have been delighted to have them do it, because it has assuaged a dim guilt
and testified to the intrinsic superiority of white people. Even the most doltish
and servile Negro could scarcely fail to be impressed by the disparity between
his situation and that of the people for whom he worked; Negroes who were neither
doltish nor servile did not feel that they were doing anything wrong when they
robbed white people. In spite of the Puritan-Yankee equation of virtue with
well-being, Negroes had excellent reasons for doubting that money was made or
kept by any very striking adherence to the Christian virtues; it certainly did
not work that way for black Christians. In any case, white people, who had robbed
black people of their liberty and who profited by this theft every hour that
they lived, had no moral ground on which to stand. They had the judges, the
juries, the shotguns, the law -- in a word, power. But it was a criminal power,
to be feared but not respected, and to be outwitted in any way whatever. And
those virtues preached but not practiced by the white world were merely another
means of holding Negroes in subjection.
-- 23 --
It turned out, then, that summer, that the moral barriers that I had supposed to exist between me and the dangers of a criminal career were so tenuous as to be nearly nonexistent. I certainly could not discover any principled reason for not becoming a criminal, and it is not my poor, God-fearing parents who are to be indicted for the lack but this society. I was icily determined -- more determined, really, than I then knew -- never to make my peace with the ghetto but to die and go to Hell before I would let any white man spit on me, before I would accept my "place" in this republic. I did not intend to allow the white people of this country to tell me who I was, and limit me that way, and polish me off that way. And yet, of course, at the same time, I was being spat on and defined and described and limited, and could have been polished off with no effort whatever. Every Negro boy -- in my situation during those years, at least -- who reaches this point realizes, at once, profoundly, because he wants to live, that he stands in great peril and must find, with speed, a "thing," a gimmick, to lift him out, to start him on his way. And it does not matter what the gimmick is. It was this last realization that terrified me and -- since it revealed that the door opened on so many dangers -- helped to hurl me into the church. And, by an unforeseeable paradox, it was my career
-- 24 --
in the church that turned out, precisely, to be my gimmick.
For when I tried to assess my capabilities, I realized that I had almost none. In order to achieve the life I wanted, I had been dealt, it seemed to me, the worst possible hand. I could not become a prizefighter -- many of us tried but very few succeeded. I could not sing. I could not dance. I had been well conditioned by the world in which I grew up, so I did not yet dare take the idea of becoming a writer seriously. The only other possibility seemed to involve my becoming one of the sordid people on the Avenue, who were not really as sordid as I then imagined but who frightened me terribly, both because I did not want to live that life and because of what they made me feel. Everything inflamed me, and that was bad enough, but I myself had also become a source of fire and temptation. I had been far too well raised, alas, to suppose that any of the extremely explicit overtures made to me that summer, sometimes by boys and girls but also, more alarmingly, by older men and women, had anything to do with my attractiveness. On the contrary, since the Harlem idea of seduction is, to put it mildly, blunt, whatever these people saw in me merely confirmed my sense of my depravity.
It is certainly sad that the awakening of one's
-- 25 --
senses should lead to such a merciless judgment of oneself -- to say nothing
of the time and anguish one spends in the effort to arrive at any other -- but
it is also inevitable that a literal attempt to mortify the flesh should be
made among black people like those with whom I grew up. Negroes in this country
-- and Negroes do not, strictly or legally speaking, exist in any other -- are
taught really to despise themselves from the moment their eyes open on the world.
This world is white and they are black. White people hold the power, which means
that they are superior to blacks (intrinsically, that is: God decreed it so),
and the world has innumerable ways of making this difference known and felt
and feared. Long before the Negro child perceives this difference, and even
longer before he understands it, he has begun to react to it, he has begun to
be controlled by it. Every effort made by the child's elders to prepare him
for a fate from which they cannot protect him causes him secretly, in terror,
to begin to await, without knowing that he is doing so, his mysterious and inexorable
punishment. He must be "good" not only in order to please his parents
and not only to avoid being punished by them; behind their authority stands
another, nameless and impersonal, infinitely harder to please, and bottomlessly
cruel. And this filters into the child's
-- 26 --
consciousness through his parents' tone of voice as he is being exhorted, punished,
or loved; in the sudden, uncontrollable note of fear heard in his mother's or
his father's voice when he has strayed beyond some particular boundary. He does
not know what the boundary is, and he can get no explanation of it, which is
frightening enough, but the fear he hears in the voices of his elders is more
frightening still. The fear that I heard in my father's voice, for example,
when he realized that I really believed I could do anything a white boy could
do, and had every intention of proving it, was not at all like the fear I heard
when one of us was ill or had fallen down the stairs or strayed too far from
the house. It was another fear, a fear that the child, in challenging the white
world's assumptions, was putting himself in the path of destruction. A child
cannot, thank Heaven, know how vast and how merciless is the nature of power,
with what unbelievable cruelty people treat each other. He reacts to the fear
in his parents' voices because his parents hold up the world for him and he
has no protection without them. I defended myself, as I imagined, against the
fear my father made me feel by remembering that he was very old-fashioned. Also,
I prided myself on the fact that I already knew how to outwit him. To defend
oneself against a fear is simply
-- 27 --
to insure that one will, one day, be conquered by it; fears must be faced. As
for one's wits, it is just not true that one can live by them -- not, that is,
if one wishes really to live. That summer, in any case, all the fears with which
I had grown up, and which were now a part of me and controlled my vision of
the world, rose up like a wall between the world and me, and drove me into the
church.
As I look back, everything I did seems curiously deliberate, though it certainly did not seem deliberate then. For example, I did not join the church of which my father was a member and in which he preached. My best friend in school, who attended a different church, had already "surrendered his life to the Lord," and he was very anxious about my soul's salvation. (I wasn't, but any human attention was better than none.) One Saturday afternoon, he took me to his church. There were no services that day, and the church was empty, except for some women cleaning and some other women praying. My friend took me into the back room to meet his pastor -- a woman. There she sat, in her robes, smiling, an extremely proud and handsome woman, with Africa, Europe, and the America of the American Indian blended in her face. She was perhaps forty-five or fifty at this time, and in our world she was a very celebrated
-- 28 --
woman. My friend was about to introduce me when she looked at me and smiled
and said, "Whose little boy are you?" Now this, unbelievably, was
precisely the phrase used by pimps and racketeers on the Avenue when they suggested,
both humorously and intensely, that I "hang out" with them. Perhaps
part of the terror they had caused me to feel came from the fact that I unquestionably
wanted to be somebody's little boy. I was so frightened, and at the mercy of
so many conundrums, that inevitably, that summer, someone would have taken me
over; one doesn't, in Harlem, long remain standing on any auction block. It
was my good luck -- perhaps -- that I found myself in the church racket instead
of some other, and surrendered to a spiritual seduction long before I came to
any carnal knowledge. For when the pastor asked me, with that marvellous smile,
"Whose little boy are you?" my heart replied at once, "Why, yours."
The summer wore on, and things got worse. I became more guilty and more frightened, and kept all this bottled up inside me, and naturally, inescapably, one night, when this woman had finished preaching, everything came roaring, screaming, crying out, and I fell to the ground before the altar. It was the strangest sensation I have ever had in my life -- up to that time, or since. I had not known that it was going to happen,
-- 29 --
or that it could happen. One moment I was on my feet, singing and clapping and,
at the same time, working out in my head the plot of a play I was working on
then; the next moment, with no transition, no sensation of falling, I was on
my back, with the lights beating down into my face and all the vertical saints
above me. I did not know what I was doing down so low, or how I had got there.
And the anguish that filled me cannot be described. It moved in me like one
of those floods that devastate counties, tearing everything down, tearing children
from their parents and lovers from each other, and making everything an unrecognizable
waste. All I really remember is the pain, the unspeakable pain; it was as though
I were yelling up to Heaven and Heaven would not hear me. And if Heaven would
not hear me, if love could not descend from Heaven -- to wash me, to make me
clean -- then utter disaster was my portion. Yes, it does indeed mean something
-- something unspeakable -- to be born, in a white country, an Anglo-Teutonic,
antisexual country, black. You very soon, without knowing it, give up all hope
of communion. Black people, mainly, look down or look up but do not look at
each other, not at you, and white people, mainly, look away. And the universe
is simply a sounding drum; there is no way, no way whatever, so it seemed then
-- 30 --
and has sometimes seemed since, to get through a life, to love your wife and
children, or your friends, or your mother and father, or to be loved. The universe,
which is not merely the stars and the moon and the planets, flowers, grass,
and trees, but other people, has evolved no terms for your existence, has made
no room for you, and if love will not swing wide the gates, no other power will
or can. And if one despairs -- as who has not? -- of human love, God's love
alone is left. But God -- and I felt this even then, so long ago, on that tremendous
floor, unwillingly -- is white. And if His love was so great, and if He loved
all His children, why were we, the blacks, cast down so far? Why? In spite of
all I said thereafter, I found no answer on the floor -- not that answer, anyway
-- and I was on the floor all night. Over me, to bring me "through,"
the saints sang and rejoiced and prayed. And in the morning, when they raised
me, they told me that I was "saved."
Well, indeed I was, in a way, for I was utterly drained and exhausted, and released, for the first time, from all my guilty torment. I was aware then only of my relief. For many years, I could not ask myself why human relief had to be achieved in a fashion at once so pagan and so desperate -- in a fashion at once so unspeakably old and so unutterably new.
-- 31 --
And by the time I was able to ask myself this question, I was also able to see
that the principles governing the rites and customs of the churches in which
I grew up did not differ from the principles governing the rites and customs
of other churches, white. The principles were Blindness, Loneliness, and Terror,
the first principle necessarily and actively cultivated in order to deny the
two others. I would love to believe that the principles were Faith, Hope, and
Charity, but this is clearly not so for most Christians, or for what we call
the Christian world.
I was saved. But at the same time, out of a deep, adolescent cunning I do not pretend to understand, I realized immediately that I could not remain in the church merely as another worshipper. I would have to give myself something to do, in order not to be too bored and find myself among all the wretched unsaved of the Avenue. And I don't doubt that I also intended to best my father on his own ground. Anyway, very shortly after I joined the church, I became a preacher -- a Young Minister -- and I remained in the pulpit for more than three years. My youth quickly made me a much bigger drawing card than my father. I pushed this advantage ruthlessly, for it was the most effective means I had found of breaking his hold over me. That was the most frightening time of my life,
-- 32 --
and quite the most dishonest, and the resulting hysteria lent great passion
to my sermons -- for a while. I relished the attention and the relative immunity
from punishment that my new status gave me, and I relished, above all, the sudden
right to privacy. It had to be recognized, after all, that I was still a schoolboy,
with my schoolwork to do, and I was also expected to prepare at least one sermon
a week. During what we may call my heyday, I preached much more often than that.
This meant that there were hours and even whole days when I could not be interrupted
-- not even by my father. I had immobilized him. It took rather more time for
me to realize that I had also immobilized myself, and had escaped from nothing
whatever.
The church was very exciting. It took a long time for me to disengage myself from this excitement, and on the blindest, most visceral level, I never really have, and never will. There is no music like that music, no drama like the drama of the saints rejoicing, the sinners moaning, the tambourines racing, and all those voices coming together and crying holy unto the Lord. There is still, for me, no pathos quite like the pathos of those multicolored, worn, somehow triumphant and transfigured faces, speaking from the depths of a visible, tangible, continuing despair of the
-- 33 --
goodness of the Lord. I have never seen anything to equal the fire and excitement
that sometimes, without warning, fill a church, causing the church, as Leadbelly
and so many others have testified, to "rock." Nothing that has happened
to me since equals the power and the glory that I sometimes felt when, in the
middle of a sermon, I knew that I was somehow, by some miracle, really carrying,
as they said, "the Word" -- when the church and I were one. Their
pain and their joy were mine, and mine were theirs -- they surrendered their
pain and joy to me, I surrendered mine to them -- and their cries of "Amen!"
and "Hallelujah!" and "Yes, Lord!" and "Praise His
name!" and "Preach it, brother!" sustained and whipped on my
solos until we all became equal, wringing wet, singing and dancing, in anguish
and rejoicing, at the foot of the altar. It was, for a long time, in spite of
-- or, not inconceivably, because of -- the shabbiness of my motives, my only
sustenance, my meat and drink. I rushed home from school, to the church, to
the altar, to be alone there, to commune with Jesus, my dearest Friend, who
would never fail me, who knew all the secrets of my heart. Perhaps He did, but
I didn't, and the bargain we struck, actually, down there at the foot of the
cross, was that He would never let me find out.
He failed His bargain. He was a much better Man
-- 34 --
than I took Him for. It happened, as things do, imperceptibly, in many ways
at once. I date it -- the slow crumbling of my faith, the pulverization of my
fortress -- from the time, about a year after I had begun to preach, when I
began to read again. I justified this desire by the fact that I was still in
school, and I began, fatally, with Dostoevski. By this time, I was in a high
school that was predominantly Jewish. This meant that I was surrounded by people
who were, by definition, beyond any hope of salvation, who laughed at the tracts
and leaflets I brought to school, and who pointed out that the Gospels had been
written long after the death of Christ. This might not have been so distressing
if it had not forced me to read the tracts and leaflets myself, for they were
indeed, unless one believed their message already, impossible to believe. I
remember feeling dimly that there was a kind of blackmail in it. People, I felt,
ought to love the Lord because they loved Him, and not because they were afraid
of going to Hell. I was forced, reluctantly, to realize that the Bible itself
had been written by men, and translated by men out of languages I could not
read, and I was already, without quite admitting it to myself, terribly involved
with the effort of putting words on paper. Of course, I had the rebuttal ready:
These men had all been operating under divine inspiration.
-- 35 --
Had they? All of them? And I also knew by now, alas, far more about divine inspiration
than I dared admit, for I knew how I worked myself up into my own visions, and
how frequently -- indeed, incessantly -- the visions God granted to me differed
from the visions He granted to my father. I did not understand the dreams I
had at night, but I knew that they were not holy. For that matter, I knew that
my waking hours were far from holy. I spent most of my time in a state of repentance
for things I had vividly desired to do but had not done. The fact that I was
dealing with Jews brought the whole question of color, which I had been desperately
avoiding, into the terrified center of my mind. I realized that the Bible had
been written by white men. I knew that, according to many Christians, I was
a descendant of Ham, who had been cursed, and that I was therefore predestined
to be a slave. This had nothing to do with anything I was, or contained, or
could become; my fate had been sealed forever, from the beginning of time. And
it seemed, indeed, when one looked out over Christendom, that this was what
Christendom effectively believed. It was certainly the way it behaved. I remembered
the Italian priests and bishops blessing Italian boys who were on their way
to Ethiopia.
Again, the Jewish boys in high school were troubling
-- 36 --
because I could find no point of connection between them and the Jewish pawnbrokers
and landlords and grocery-store owners in Harlem. I knew that these people were
Jews -- God knows I was told it often enough -- but I thought of them only as
white. Jews, as such, until I got to high school, were all incarcerated in the
Old Testament, and their names were Abraham, Moses, Daniel, Ezekiel, and Job,
and Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. It was bewildering to find them so many
miles and centuries out of Egypt, and so far from the fiery furnace. My best
friend in high school was a Jew. He came to our house once, and afterward my
father asked, as he asked about everyone, "Is he a Christian?" --
by which he meant "Is he saved?" I really do not know whether my answer
came out of innocence or venom, but I said coldly, "No. He's Jewish."
My father slammed me across the face with his great palm, and in that moment
everything flooded back -- all the hatred and all the fear, and the depth of
a merciless resolve to kill my father rather than allow my father to kill me
-- and I knew that all those sermons and tears and all that repentance and rejoicing
had changed nothing. I wondered if I was expected to be glad that a friend of
mine, or anyone, was to be tormented forever in Hell, and I also thought, suddenly,
of the Jews in another
-- 37 --
Christian nation, Germany. They were not so far from the fiery furnace after
all, and my best friend might have been one of them. I told my father, "He's
a better Christian than you are," and walked out of the house. The battle
between us was in the open, but that was all right; it was almost a relief.
A more deadly struggle had begun.
Being in the pulpit was like being in the theatre; I was behind the scenes and knew how the illusion was worked. I knew the other ministers and knew the quality of their lives. And I don't mean to suggest by this the "Elmer Gantry" sort of hypocrisy concerning sensuality; it was a deeper, deadlier, and more subtle hypocrisy than that, and a little honest sensuality, or a lot, would have been like water in an extremely bitter desert. I knew how to work on a congregation until the last dime was surrendered -- it was not very hard to do -- and I knew where the money for "the Lord's work" went. I knew, though I did not wish to know it, that I had no respect for the people with whom I worked. I could not have said it then, but I also knew that if I continued I would soon have no respect for myself. And the fact that I was "the young Brother Baldwin" increased my value with those same pimps and racketeers who had helped to stampede me into the church in the first place. They still saw the little
-- 38 --
boy they intended to take over. They were waiting for me to come to my senses
and realize that I was in a very lucrative business. They knew that I did not
yet realize this, and also that I had not yet begun to suspect where my own
needs, coming up (they were very patient), could drive me. They themselves did
know the score, and they knew that the odds were in their favor, And, really,
I knew it, too. I was even lonelier and more vulnerable than I had been before.
And the blood of the Lamb had not cleansed me in any way whatever. I was just
as black as I had been the day that I was born. Therefore, when I faced a congregation,
it began to take all the strength I had not to stammer, not to curse, not to
tell them to throw away their Bibles and get off their knees and go home and
organize, for example, a rent strike. When I watched all the children, their
copper, brown, and beige faces staring up at me as I taught Sunday school, I
felt that I was committing a crime in talking about the gentle Jesus, in telling
them to reconcile themselves to their misery on earth in order to gain the crown
of eternal life. Were only Negroes to gain this crown? Was Heaven, then, to
be merely another ghetto? Perhaps I might have been able to reconcile myself
even to this if I had been able to believe that there was any loving-kindness
to be found in the haven I represented. But I
-- 39 --
had been in the pulpit too long and I had seen too many monstrous things. I
don't refer merely to the glaring fact that the minister eventually acquires
houses and Cadillacs while the faithful continue to scrub floors and drop their
dimes and quarters and dollars into the plate. I really mean that there was
no love in the church. It was a mask for hatred and self-hatred and despair.
The transfiguring power of the Holy Ghost ended when the service ended, and
salvation stopped at the church door. When we were told to love everybody, I
had thought that that meant everybody. But no. It applied only to those who
believed as we did, and it did not apply to white people at all. I was told
by a minister, for example, that I should never, on any public conveyance, under
any circumstances, rise and give my seat to a white woman. White men never rose
for Negro women. Well, that was true enough, in the main -- I saw his point.
But what was the point, the purpose, of my salvation if it did not permit me
to behave with love toward others, no matter how they behaved toward me? What
others did was their responsibility, for which they would answer when the judgment
trumpet sounded. But what I did was my responsibility, and I would have to answer,
too -- unless, of course, there was also in Heaven a special dispensation for
the
-- 40 --
benighted black, who was not to be judged in the same way as other human beings,
or angels. It probably occurred to me around this time that the vision people
hold of the world to come is but a reflection, with predictable wishful distortions,
of the world in which they live. And this did not apply only to Negroes, who
were no more "simple" or "spontaneous" or "Christian"
than anybody else -- who were merely more oppressed. In the same way that we,
for white people, were the descendants of Ham, and were cursed forever, white
people were, for us, the descendants of Cain. And the passion with which we
loved the Lord was a measure of how deeply we feared and distrusted and, in
the end, hated almost all strangers, always, and avoided and despised ourselves.
But I cannot leave it at that; there is more to it than that. In spite of everything, there was in the life I fled a zest and a joy and a capacity for facing and surviving disaster that are very moving and very rare. Perhaps we were, all of us -- pimps, whores, racketeers, church members, and children -- bound together by the nature of our oppression, the specific and peculiar complex of risks we had to run; if so, within these limits we sometimes achieved with each other a freedom that was close to love. I remember, anyway, church suppers and outings, and, later, after I left the church,
-- 41 --
rent and waistline parties where rage and sorrow sat in the darkness and did
not stir, and we ate and drank and talked and laughed and danced and forgot
all about "the man." We had the liquor, the chicken, the music, and
each other, and had no need to pretend to be what we were not. This is the freedom
that one hears in some gospel songs, for example, and in jazz. In all jazz,
and especially in the blues, there is something tart and ironic, authoritative
and double-edged. White Americans seem to feel that happy songs are happy and
sad songs are sad, and that, God help us, is exactly the way most white Americans
sing them -- sounding, in both cases, so helplessly, defenselessly fatuous that
one dare not speculate on the temperature of the deep freeze from which issue
their brave and sexless little voices. Only people who have been "down
the line," as the song puts it, know what this music is about. I think
it was Big Bill Broonzy who used to sing "I Feel So Good," a really
joyful song about a man who is on his way to the railroad station to meet his
girl. She's coming home. It is the singer's incredibly moving exuberance that
makes one realize how leaden the time must have been while she was gone. There
is no guarantee that she will stay this time, either, as the singer clearly
knows, and, in fact, she has not yet actually arrived. Tonight, or tomorrow,
-- 42 --
or within the next five minutes, he may very well be singing "Lonesome
in My Bedroom," or insisting, "Ain't we, ain't we, going to make it
all right? Well, if we don't today, we will tomorrow night." White Americans
do not understand the depths out of which such an ironic tenacity comes, but
they suspect that the force is sensual, and they are terrified of sensuality
and do not any longer understand it. The word "sensual" is not intended
to bring to mind quivering dusky maidens or priapic black studs. I am referring
to something much simpler and much less fanciful. To be sensual, I think, is
to respect and rejoice in the force of life, of life itself, and to be present
in all that one does, from the effort of loving to the breaking of bread. It
will be a great day for America, incidentally, when we begin to eat bread again,
instead of the blasphemous and tasteless foam rubber that we have substituted
for it. And I am not being frivolous now, either. Something very sinister happens
to the people of a country when they begin to distrust their own reactions as
deeply as they do here, and become as joyless as they have become. It is this
individual uncertainty on the part of white American men and women, this inability
to renew themselves at the fountain of their own lives, that makes the discussion,
let alone elucidation, of any conundrum -- that
-- 43 --
is, any reality -- so supremely difficult. The person who distrusts himself
has no touchstone for reality -- for this touchstone can be only oneself. Such
a person interposes between himself and reality nothing less than a labyrinth
of attitudes. And these attitudes, furthermore, though the person is usually
unaware of it (is unaware of so much!), are historical and public attitudes.
They do not relate to the present any more than they relate to the person. Therefore,
whatever white people do not know about Negroes reveals, precisely and inexorably,
what they do not know about themselves.
White Christians have also forgotten several elementary historical details. They have forgotten that the religion that is now identified with their virtue and their power -- "God is on our side," says Dr. Verwoerd -- came out of a rocky piece of ground in what is now known as the Middle East before color was invented, and that in order for the Christian church to be established, Christ had to be put to death, by Rome, and that the real architect of the Christian church was not the disreputable, sunbaked Hebrew who gave it his name but the mercilessly fanatical and self-righteous St. Paul. The energy that was buried with the rise of the Christian nations must come back into the world; nothing can prevent it. Many of us, I think,
-- 44 --
both long to see this happen and are terrified of it, for though this transformation
contains the hope of liberation, it also imposes a necessity for great change.
But in order to deal with the untapped and dormant force of the previously subjugated,
in order to survive as a human, moving, moral weight in the world, America and
all the Western nations will be forced to reëxamine themselves and release
themselves from many things that are now taken to be sacred, and to discard
nearly all the assumptions that have been used to justify their lives and their
anguish and their crimes so long.
"The white man's Heaven," sings a Black Muslim minister, "is the black man's Hell." One may object -- possibly -- that this puts the matter somewhat too simply, but the song is true, and it has been true for as long as white men have ruled the world. The Africans put it another way: When the white man came to Africa, the white man had the Bible and the African had the land, but now it is the white man who is being, reluctantly and bloodily, separated from the land, and the African who is still attempting to digest or to vomit up the Bible. The struggle, therefore, that now begins in the world is extremely complex, involving the historical role of Christianity in the realm of power -- that is, politics -- and in the realm of morals. In the realm of power, Christianity has operated with an unmitigated arrogance
-- 45 --
and cruelty -- necessarily, since a religion ordinarily imposes on those who
have discovered the true faith the spiritual duty of liberating the infidels.
This particular true faith, moreover, is more deeply concerned about the soul
than it is about the body, to which fact the flesh (and the corpses) of countless
infidels bears witness. It goes without saying, then, that whoever questions
the authority of the true faith also contests the right of the nations that
hold this faith to rule over him -- contests, in short, their title to his land.
The spreading of the Gospel, regardless of the motives or the integrity or the
heroism of some of the missionaries, was an absolutely indispensable justification
for the planting of the flag. Priests and nuns and school-teachers helped to
protect and sanctify the power that was so ruthlessly being used by people who
were indeed seeking a city, but not one in the heavens, and one to be made,
very definitely, by captive hands. The Christian church itself -- again, as
distinguished from some of its ministers -- sanctified and rejoiced in the conquests
of the flag, and encouraged, if it did not formulate, the belief that conquest,
with the resulting relative well-being of the Western populations, was proof
of the favor of God. God had come a long way from the desert -- but then so
had Allah, though in a very different direction. God, going north, and rising
on the
-- 46 --
wings of power, had become white, and Allah, out of power, and on the dark side
of Heaven, had become -- for all practical purposes, anyway -- black. Thus,
in the realm of morals the role of Christianity has been, at best, ambivalent.
Even leaving out of account the remarkable arrogance that assumed that the ways
and morals of others were inferior to those of Christians, and that they therefore
had every right, and could use any means, to change them, the collision between
cultures -- and the schizophrenia in the mind of Christendom -- had rendered
the domain of morals as chartless as the sea once was, and as treacherous as
the sea still is. It is not too much to say that whoever wishes to become a
truly moral human being (and let us not ask whether or not this is possible;
I think we must believe that it is possible) must first divorce himself from
all the prohibitions, crimes, and hypocrisies of the Christian church. If the
concept of God has any validity or any use, it can only be to make us larger,
freer, and more loving. If God cannot do this, then it is time we got rid of
Him.
I HAD HEARD a great deal, long before I finally met him, of the Honorable Elijah Muhammad, and of the Nation of Islam movement, of which he is the
-- 47 --
leader. I paid very little attention to what I heard, because the burden of
his message did not strike me as being very original; I had been hearing variations
of it all my life. I sometimes found myself in Harlem on Saturday nights, and
I stood in the crowds, at 125th Street and Seventh Avenue, and listened to the
Muslim speakers. But I had heard hundreds of such speeches -- or so it seemed
to me at first. Anyway, I have long had a very definite tendency to tune out
the moment I come anywhere near either a pulpit or a soapbox. What these men
were saying about white people I had often heard before. And I dismissed the
Nation of Islam's demand for a separate black economy in America, which I had
also heard before, as willful, and even mischievous, nonsense. Then two things
caused me to begin to listen to the speeches, and one was the behavior of the
police. After all, I had seen men dragged from their platforms on this very
corner for saying less virulent things, and I had seen many crowds dispersed
by policemen, with clubs or on horseback. But the policemen were doing nothing
now. Obviously, this was not because they had become more human but because
they were under orders and because they were afraid. And indeed they were, and
I was delighted to see it. There they stood, in twos and threes and fours, in
their Cub Scout uniforms
-- 48 --
and with their Cub Scout faces, totally unprepared, as is the way with American
he-men, for anything that could not be settled with a club or a fist or a gun.
I might have pitied them if I had not found myself in their hands so often and
discovered, through ugly experience, what they were like when they held the
power and what they were like when you held the power. The behavior of the crowd,
its silent intensity, was the other thing that forced me to reassess the speakers
and their message. I sometimes think, with despair, that Americans will swallow
whole any political speech whatever -- we've been doing very little else, these
last, bad years -- so it may not mean anything to say that this sense of integrity,
after what Harlem, especially, has been through in the way of demagogues, was
a very startling change. Still, the speakers had an air of utter dedication,
and the people looked toward them with a kind of intelligence of hope on their
faces -- not as though they were being consoled or drugged but as though they
were being jolted.
Power was the subject of the speeches I heard. We were offered, as Nation of Islam doctrine, historical and divine proof that all white people are cursed, and are devils, and are about to be brought down. This has been revealed by Allah Himself to His prophet,
-- 49 --
the Honorable Elijah Muhammad. The white man's rule will be ended forever in
ten or fifteen years (and it must be conceded that all present signs would seem
to bear witness to the accuracy of the prophet's statement). The crowd seemed
to swallow this theology with no effort -- all crowds do swallow theology this
way, I gather, in both sides of Jerusalem, in Istanbul, and in Rome -- and,
as theology goes, it was no more indigestible than the more familiar brand asserting
that there is a curse on the sons of Ham. No more, and no less, and it had been
designed for the same purpose; namely, the sanctification of power. But very
little time was spent on theology, for one did not need to prove to a Harlem
audience that all white men were devils. They were merely glad to have, at last,
divine corroboration of their experience, to hear -- and it was a tremendous
thing to hear -- that they had been lied to for all these years and generations,
and that their captivity was ending, for God was black. Why were they hearing
it now, since this was not the first time it had been said? I had heard it many
times, from various prophets, during all the years that I was growing up. Elijah
Muhammad himself has now been carrying the same message for more than thirty
years; he is not an overnight sensation, and we owe his ministry, I am told,
to the fact that when he was a child of
-- 50 --
six or so, his father was lynched before his eyes. (So much for states' rights.)
And now, suddenly, people who have never before been able to hear this message
hear it, and believe it, and are changed. Elijah Muhammad has been able to do
what generations of welfare workers and committees and resolutions and reports
and housing projects and playgrounds have failed to do: to heal and redeem drunkards
and junkies, to convert people who have come out of prison and to keep them
out, to make men chaste and women virtuous, and to invest both the male and
the female with a pride and a serenity that hang about them like an unfailing
light. He has done all these things, which our Christian church has spectacularly
failed to do. How has Elijah managed it?
Well, in a way -- and I have no wish to minimize his peculiar role and his peculiar achievement -- it is not he who has done it but time. Time catches up with kingdoms and crushes them, gets its teeth into doctrines and rends them; time reveals the foundations on which any kingdom rests, and eats at those foundations, and it destroys doctrines by proving them to be untrue. In those days, not so very long ago, when the priests of that church which stands in Rome gave God's blessing to Italian boys being sent out to ravage a defenseless black country -- which until that event,
-- 51 --
incidentally, had not considered itself to be black -- it was not possible to
believe in a black God. To entertain such a belief would have been to entertain
madness. But time has passed, and in that time the Christian world has revealed
itself as morally bankrupt and politically unstable. The Tunisians were quite
right in 1956 -- and it was a very significant moment in Western (and African)
history -- when they countered the French justification for remaining in North
Africa with the question "Are the French ready for self-government?"
Again, the terms "civilized" and "Christian" begin to have
a very strange ring, particularly in the ears of those who have been judged
to be neither civilized nor Christian, when a Christian nation surrenders to
a foul and violent orgy, as Germany did during the Third Reich. For the crime
of their ancestry, millions of people in the middle of the twentieth century,
and in the heart of Europe -- God's citadel -- were sent to a death so calculated,
so hideous, and so prolonged that no age before this enlightened one had been
able to imagine it, much less achieve and record it. Furthermore, those beneath
the Western heel, unlike those within the West, are aware that Germany's current
role in Europe is to act as a bulwark against the "uncivilized" hordes,
and since power is what the powerless want, they understand
-- 52 --
very well what we of the West want to keep, and are not deluded by our talk
of a freedom that we have never been willing to share with them. From my own
point of view, the fact of the Third Reich alone makes obsolete forever any
question of Christian superiority, except in technological terms. White people
were, and are, astounded by the holocaust in Germany. They did not know that
they could act that way. But I very much doubt whether black people were astounded
-- at least, in the same way. For my part, the fate of the Jews, and the world's
indifference to it, frightened me very much. I could not but feel, in those
sorrowful years, that this human indifference, concerning which I knew so much
already, would be my portion on the day that the United States decided to murder
its Negroes systematically instead of little by little and catch-as-catch-can.
I was, of course, authoritatively assured that what had happened to the Jews
in Germany could not happen to the Negroes in America, but I thought, bleakly,
that the German Jews had probably believed similar counsellors, and, again,
I could not share the white man's vision of himself for the very good reason
that white men in America do not behave toward black men the way they behave
toward each other. When a white man faces a black man, especially if the black
man is helpless,
-- 53 --
terrible things are revealed. I know. I have been carried into precinct basements
often enough, and I have seen and heard and endured the secrets of desperate
white men and women, which they knew were safe with me, because even if I should
speak, no one would believe me. And they would not believe me precisely because
they would know that what I said was true.
The treatment accorded the Negro during the Second World War marks, for me, a turning point in the Negro's relation to America. To put it briefly, and somewhat too simply, a certain hope died, a certain respect for white Americans faded. One began to pity them, or to hate them. You must put yourself in the skin of a man who is wearing the uniform of his country, is a candidate for death in its defense, and who is called a "nigger" by his comrades-in-arms and his officers; who is almost always given the hardest, ugliest, most menial work to do; who knows that the white G.I. has informed the Europeans that he is sub-human (so much for the American male's sexual security); who does not dance at the U.S.O. the night white soldiers dance there, and does not drink in the same bars white soldiers drink in; and who watches German prisoners of war being treated by Americans with more human dignity than he has ever received
-- 54 --
at their hands. And who, at the same time, as a human being, is far freer in
a strange land than he has ever been at home. Home! The very word begins to
have a despairing and diabolical ring. You must consider what happens to this
citizen, after all he has endured, when he returns -- home: search, in his shoes,
for a job, for a place to live; ride, in his skin, on segregated buses; see,
with his eyes, the signs saying "White" and "Colored," and
especially the signs that say "White Ladies" and "Colored Women";
look into the eyes of his wife; look into the eyes of his son; listen, with
his ears, to political speeches, North and South; imagine yourself being told
to "wait." And all this is happening in the richest and freest country
in the world, and in the middle of the twentieth century. The subtle and deadly
change of heart that might occur in you would be involved with the realization
that a civilization is not destroyed by wicked people; it is not necessary that
people be wicked but only that they be spineless. I and two Negro acquaintances,
all of us well past thirty, and looking it, were in the bar of Chicago's O'Hare
Airport several months ago, and the bartender refused to serve us, because,
he said, we looked too young. It took a vast amount of patience not to strangle
him, and great insistence and some luck to get the manager, who defended his
bartender
-- 55 --
on the ground that he was "new" and had not yet, presumably, learned
how to distinguish between a Negro boy of twenty and a Negro "boy"
of thirty-seven. Well, we were served, finally, of course, but by this time
no amount of Scotch would have helped us. The bar was very crowded, and our
altercation had been extremely noisy; not one customer in the bar had done anything
to help us. When it was over, and the three of us stood at the bar trembling
with rage and frustration, and drinking -- and trapped, now, in the airport,
for we had deliberately come early in order to have a few drinks and to eat
-- a young white man standing near us asked if we were students. I suppose he
thought that this was the only possible explanation for our putting up a fight.
I told him that he hadn't wanted to talk to us earlier and we didn't want to
talk to him now. The reply visibly hurt his feelings, and this, in turn, caused
me to despise him. But when one of us, a Korean War veteran, told this young
man that the fight we had been having in the bar had been his fight, too, the
young man said, "I lost my conscience a long time ago," and turned
and walked out. I know that one would rather not think so, but this young man
is typical. So, on the basis of the evidence, had everyone else in the bar lost
his conscience. A few years ago, I would have hated these people with all
-- 56 --
my heart. Now I pitied them, pitied them in order not to despise them. And this
is not the happiest way to feel toward one's countrymen.
But, in the end, it is the threat of universal extinction hanging over all the world today that changes, totally and forever, the nature of reality and brings into devastating question the true meaning of man's history. We human beings now have the power to exterminate ourselves; this seems to be the entire sum of our achievement. We have taken this journey and arrived at this place in God's name. This, then, is the best that God (the white God) can do. If that is so, then it is time to replace Him -- replace Him with what? And this void, this despair, this torment is felt everywhere in the West, from the streets of Stockholm to the churches of New Orleans and the sidewalks of Harlem.
God is black. All black men belong to Islam; they have been chosen. And Islam shall rule the world. The dream, the sentiment is old; only the color is new. And it is this dream, this sweet possibility, that thousands of oppressed black men and women in this country now carry away with them after the Muslim minister has spoken, through the dark, noisome ghetto streets, into the hovels where so many have
-- 57 --
perished. The white God has not delivered them; perhaps the Black God will.
While I was in Chicago last summer, the Honorable Elijah Muhammad invited me to have dinner at his home. This is a stately mansion on Chicago's South Side, and it is the headquarters of the Nation of Islam movement. I had not gone to Chicago to meet Elijah Muhammad -- he was not in my thoughts at all -- but the moment I received the invitation, it occurred to me that I ought to have expected it. In a way, I owe the invitation to the incredible, abysmal, and really cowardly obtuseness of white liberals. Whether in private debate or in public, any attempt I made to explain how the Black Muslim movement came about, and how it has achieved such force, was met with a blankness that revealed the little connection that the liberals' attitudes have with their perceptions or their lives, or even their knowledge -- revealed, in fact, that they could deal with the Negro as a symbol or a victim but had no sense of him as a man. When Malcolm X, who is considered the movement's second-in-command, and heir apparent, points out that the cry of "violence" was not raised, for example, when the Israelis fought to regain Israel, and, indeed, is raised only when black men indicate
-- 58 --
that they will fight for their rights, he is speaking the truth. The conquests
of England, every single one of them bloody, are part of what Americans have
in mind when they speak of England's glory. In the United States, violence and
heroism have been made synonymous except when it comes to blacks, and the only
way to defeat Malcolm's point is to concede it and then ask oneself why this
is so. Malcolm's statement is not answered by references to the triumphs of
the N.A.A.C.P., the more particularly since very few liberals have any notion
of how long, how costly, and how heartbreaking a task it is to gather the evidence
that one can carry into court, or how long such court battles take. Neither
is it answered by references to the student sit-in-movement, if only because
not all Negroes are students and not all of them live in the South. I, in any
case, certainly refuse to be put in the position of denying the truth of Malcolm's
statements simply because I disagree with his conclusions, or in order to pacify
the liberal conscience. Things are as bad as the Muslims say they are -- in
fact, they are worse, and the Muslims do not help matters -- but there is no
reason that black men should be expected to be more patient, more forbearing,
more farseeing than whites; indeed, quite the contrary. The real reason that
nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in
-- 59 --
Negroes -- I am not speaking now of its racial value, another matter altogether
-- is that white men do not want their lives, their self-image, or their property
threatened. One wishes they would say so more often. At the end of a television
program on which Malcolm X and I both appeared, Malcolm was stopped by a white
member of the audience who said, "I have a thousand dollars and an acre
of land. What's going to happen to me?" I admired the directness of the
man's question, but I didn't hear Malcolm's reply, because I was trying to explain
to someone else that the situation of the Irish a hundred years ago and the
situation of the Negro today cannot very usefully be compared. Negroes were
brought here in chains long before the Irish ever thought of leaving Ireland;
what manner of consolation is it to be told that emigrants arriving here --
voluntarily -- long after you did have risen far above you? In the hall, as
I was waiting for the elevator, someone shook my hand and said, "Goodbye,
Mr. James Baldwin. We'll soon be addressing you as Mr. James X." And I
thought, for an awful moment, My God, if this goes on much longer, you probably
will. Elijah Muhammad had seen this show, I think, or another one, and he had
been told about me. Therefore, late on a hot Sunday afternoon, I presented myself
at his door.
-- 60 --
I was frightened, because I had, in effect, been summoned into a royal presence. I was frightened for another reason, too. I knew the tension in me between love and power, between pain and rage, and the curious, the grinding way I remained extended between these poles -- perpetually attempting to choose the better rather than the worse. But this choice was a choice in terms of a personal, a private better (I was, after all, a writer); what was its relevance in terms of a social worse? Here was the South Side -- a million in captivity -- stretching from this doorstep as far as the eye could see. And they didn't even read; depressed populations don't have the time or energy to spare. The affluent populations, which should have been their help, didn't, as far as could be discovered, read, either -- they merely bought books and devoured them, but not in order to learn: in order to learn new attitudes. Also, I knew that once I had entered the house, I couldn't smoke or drink, and I felt guilty about the cigarettes in my pocket, as I had felt years ago when my friend first took me into his church. I was half an hour late, having got lost on the way here, and I felt as deserving of a scolding as a schoolboy.
The young man who came to the door -- he was about thirty, perhaps, with a handsome, smiling face -- didn't seem to find my lateness offensive, and
-- 61 --
led me into a large room. On one side of the room sat half a dozen women, all
in white; they were much occupied with a beautiful baby, who seemed to belong
to the youngest of the women. On the other side of the room sat seven or eight
men, young, dressed in dark suits, very much at ease, and very imposing. The
sunlight came into the room with the peacefulness one remembers from rooms in
one's early childhood -- a sunlight encountered later only in one's dreams.
I remember being astounded by the quietness, the ease, the peace, the taste.
I was introduced, they greeted me with a genuine cordiality and respect -- and
the respect increased my fright, for it meant that they expected something of
me that I knew in my heart, for their sakes, I could not give -- and we sat
down. Elijah Muhammad was not in the room. Conversation was slow, but not as
stiff as I had feared it would be. They kept it going, for I simply did not
know which subjects I could acceptably bring up. They knew more about me, and
had read more of what I had written, than I had expected, and I wondered what
they made of it all, what they took my usefulness to be. The women were carrying
on their own conversation, in low tones; I gathered that they were not expected
to take part in male conversations. A few women kept coming in and out of the
room, apparently making
-- 62 --
preparations for dinner. We, the men, did not plunge deeply into any subject,
for, clearly, we were all waiting for the appearance of Elijah. Presently, the
men, one by one, left the room and returned. Then I was asked if I would like
to wash, and I, too, walked down the hall to the bathroom. Shortly after I came
back, we stood up, and Elijah entered.
I do not know what I had expected to see. I had read some of his speeches, and had heard fragments of others on the radio and on television, so I associated him with ferocity. But, no -- the man who came into the room was small and slender, really very delicately put together, with a thin face, large, warm eyes, and a most winning smile. Something came into the room with him -- his disciples' joy at seeing him, his joy at seeing them. It was the kind of encounter one watches with a smile simply because it is so rare that people enjoy one another. He teased the women, like a father, with no hint of that ugly and unctuous flirtatiousness I knew so well from other churches, and they responded like that, with great freedom and yet from a great and loving distance. He had seen me when he came into the room, I knew, though he had not looked my way. I had the feeling, as he talked and laughed with the others, whom I could only think of as his children, that he was sizing me up, deciding
-- 63 --
something. Now he turned toward me, to welcome me, with that marvellous smile,
and carried me back nearly twenty-four years, to that moment when the pastor
had smiled at me and said, "Whose little boy are you?" I did not respond
now as I had responded then, because there are some things (not many, alas!)
that one cannot do twice. But I knew what he made me feel, how I was drawn toward
his peculiar authority, how his smile promised to take the burden of my life
off my shoulders. Take your burdens to the Lord and leave them there. The central
quality in Elijah's face is pain, and his smile is a witness to it -- pain so
old and deep and black that it becomes personal and particular only when he
smiles. One wonders what he would sound like if he could sing. He turned to
me, with that smile, and said something like "I've got a lot to say to
you, but we'll wait until we sit down." And I laughed. He made me think
of my father and me as we might have been if we had been friends.
In the dining room, there were two long tables; the men sat at one and the women at the other. Elijah was at the head of our table, and I was seated at his left. I can scarcely remember what we ate, except that it was plentiful, sane, and simple -- so sane and simple that it made me feel extremely decadent, and I think that I drank, therefore, two glasses of milk. Elijah
-- 64 --
mentioned having seen me on television and said that it seemed to him that I
was not yet brainwashed and was trying to become myself. He said this in a curiously
unnerving way, his eyes looking into mine and one hand half hiding his lips,
as though he were trying to conceal bad teeth. But his teeth were not bad. Then
I remembered hearing that he had spent time in prison. I suppose that I would
like to become myself, whatever that may mean, but I knew that Elijah's meaning
and mine were not the same. I said yes, I was trying to be me, but I did not
know how to say more than that, and so I waited.
Whenever Elijah spoke, a kind of chorus arose from the table, saying "Yes, that's right." This began to set my teeth on edge. And Elijah himself had a further, unnerving habit, which was to ricochet his questions and comments off someone else on their way to you. Now, turning to the man on his right, he began to speak of the white devils with whom I had last appeared on TV: What had they made him (me) feel? I could not answer this and was not absolutely certain that I was expected to. The people referred to had certainly made me feel exasperated and useless, but I did not think of them as devils. Elijah went on about the crimes of white people, to this endless chorus of "Yes, that's right." Someone at the table said, "The white
-- 65 --
man sure is a devil. He proves that by his own actions." I looked around.
It was a very young man who had said this, scarcely more than a boy -- very
dark and sober, very bitter. Elijah began to speak of the Christian religion,
of Christians, in the same soft, joking way. I began to see that Elijah's power
came from his single-mindedness. There is nothing calculated about him; he means
every word he says. The real reason, according to Elijah, that I failed to realize
that the white man was a devil was that I had been too long exposed to white
teaching and had never received true instruction. "The so-called American
Negro" is the only reason Allah has permitted the United States to endure
so long; the white man's time was up in 1913, but it is the will of Allah that
this lost black nation, the black men of this country, be redeemed from their
white masters and returned to the true faith, which is Islam. Until this is
done -- and it will be accomplished very soon -- the total destruction of the
white man is being delayed. Elijah's mission is to return "the so-called
Negro" to Islam, to separate the chosen of Allah from this doomed nation.
Furthermore, the white man knows his history, knows himself to be a devil, and
knows that his time is running out, and all his technology, psychology, science,
and "tricknology" are being expended in the effort to
-- 66 --
prevent black men from hearing the truth. This truth is that at the very beginning
of time there was not one white face to be found in all the universe. Black
men ruled the earth and the black man was perfect. This is the truth concerning
the era that white men now refer to as prehistoric. They want black men to believe
that they, like white men, once lived in caves and swung from trees and ate
their meat raw and did not have the power of speech. But this is not true. Black
men were never in such a condition. Allah allowed the Devil, through his scientists,
to carry on infernal experiments, which resulted, finally, in the creation of
the devil known as the white man, and later, even more disastrously, in the
creation of the white woman. And it was decreed that these monstrous creatures
should rule the earth for a certain number of years -- I forget how many thousand,
but, in any case, their rule now is ending, and Allah, who had never approved
of the creation of the white man in the first place (who knows him, in fact,
to be not a man at all but a devil), is anxious to restore the rule of peace
that the rise of the white man totally destroyed. There is thus, by definition,
no virtue in white people, and since they are another creation entirely and
can no more, by breeding, become black than a cat, by breeding, can become a
horse, there is no hope for them.
-- 67 --
There is nothing new in this merciless formulation except the explicitness of its symbols and the candor of its hatred. Its emotional tone is as familiar to me as my own skin; it is but another way of saying that sinners shall be bound in Hell a thousand years. That sinners have always, for American Negroes, been white is a truth we needn't labor, and every American Negro, therefore, risks having the gates of paranoia close on him. In a society that is entirely hostile, and, by its nature, seems determined to cut you down -- that has cut down so many in the past and cuts down so many every day -- it begins to be almost impossible to distinguish a real from a fancied injury. One can very quickly cease to attempt this distinction, and, what is worse, one usually ceases to attempt it without realizing that one has done so. All doormen, for example, and all policemen have by now, for me, become exactly the same, and my style with them is designed simply to intimidate them before they can intimidate me. No doubt I am guilty of some injustice here, but it is irreducible, since I cannot risk assuming that the humanity of these people is more real to them than their uniforms. Most Negroes cannot risk assuming that the humanity of white people is more real to them than their color. And this leads, imperceptibly but inevitably, to a state of mind in which, having
-- 68 --
long ago learned to expect the worst, one finds it very easy to believe the
worst. The brutality with which Negroes are treated in this country simply cannot
be overstated, however unwilling white men may be to hear it. In the beginning
-- and neither can this be overstated -- a Negro just cannot believe that white
people are treating him as they do; he does not know what he has done to merit
it. And when he realizes that the treatment accorded him has nothing to do with
anything he has done, that the attempt of white people to destroy him -- for
that is what it is -- is utterly gratuitous, it is not hard for him to think
of white people as devils. For the horrors of the American Negro's life there
has been almost no language. The privacy of his experience, which is only beginning
to be recognized in language, and which is denied or ignored in official and
popular speech -- hence the Negro idiom -- lends credibility to any system that
pretends to clarify it. And, in fact, the truth about the black man, as a historical
entity and as a human being, has been hidden from him, deliberately and cruelly;
the power of the white world is threatened whenever a black man refuses to accept
the white world's definitions. So every attempt is made to cut that black man
down -- not only was made yesterday but is made today. Who, then, is to say
with authority
-- 69 --
where the root of so much anguish and evil lies? Why, then, is it not possible
that all things began with the black man and that he was perfect -- especially
since this is precisely the claim that white people have put forward for themselves
all these years? Furthermore, it is now absolutely clear that white people are
a minority in the world -- so severe a minority that they now look rather more
like an invention -- and that they cannot possibly hope to rule it any longer.
If this is so, why is it not also possible that they achieved their original
dominance by stealth and cunning and bloodshed and in opposition to the will
of Heaven, and not, as they claim, by Heaven's will? And if this is so, then
the sword they have used so long against others can now, without mercy, be used
against them. Heavenly witnesses are a tricky lot, to be used by whoever is
closest to Heaven at the time. And legend and theology, which are designed to
sanctify our fears, crimes, and aspirations, also reveal them for what they
are.
I said, at last, in answer to some other ricocheted questions, "I left the church twenty years ago and I haven't joined anything since." It was my way of saying that I did not intend to join their movement, either.
"And what are you now?" Elijah asked.
-- 70 --
I was in something of a bind, for I really could not say -- could not allow myself to be stampeded into saying -- that I was a Christian. "I? Now? Nothing." This was not enough. "I'm a writer. I like doing things alone." I heard myself saying this. Elijah smiled at me. "I don't, anyway," I said, finally, "think about it a great deal."
Elijah said, to his right, "I think he ought to think about it all the deal," and with this the table agreed. But there was nothing malicious or condemnatory in it. I had the stifling feeling that they knew I belonged to them but knew that I did not know it yet, that I remained unready, and that they were simply waiting, patiently, and with assurance, for me to discover the truth for myself. For where else, after all, could I go? I was black, and therefore a part of Islam, and would be saved from the holocaust awaiting the white world whether I would or no. My weak, deluded scruples could avail nothing against the iron word of the prophet.
I felt that I was back in my father's house -- as, indeed, in a way, I was -- and I told Elijah that I did not care if white and black people married, and that I had many white friends. I would have no choice, if it came to it, but to perish with them, for (I said to myself, but not to Elijah), "I love a few people and they love me
-- 71 --
and some of them are white, and isn't love more important than color?"
Elijah looked at me with great kindness and affection, great pity, as though he were reading my heart, and indicated, skeptically, that I might have white friends, or think I did, and they might be trying to be decent -- now -- but their time was up. It was almost as though he were saying, "They had their chance, man, and they goofed!"
And I looked around the table. I certainly had no evidence to give them that would outweigh Elijah's authority or the evidence of their own lives or the reality of the streets outside. Yes, I knew two or three people, white, whom I would trust with my life, and I knew a few others, white, who were struggling as hard as they knew how, and with great effort and sweat and risk, to make the world more human. But how could I say this? One cannot argue with anyone's experience or decision or belief. All my evidence would be thrown out of court as irrelevant to the main body of the case, for I could cite only exceptions. The South Side proved the justice of the indictment; the state of the world proved the justice of the indictment. Everything else, stretching back throughout recorded time, was merely a history of those exceptions who had tried to change the world and had failed.
-- 72 --
Was this true? Had they failed? How much depended on the point of view? For
it would seem that a certain category of exceptions never failed to make the
world worse -- that category, precisely, for whom power is more real than love.
And yet power is real, and many things, including, very often, love, cannot
be achieved without it. In the eeriest way possible, I suddenly had a glimpse
of what white people must go through at a dinner table when they are trying
to prove that Negroes are not subhuman. I had almost said, after all, "Well,
take my friend Mary," and very nearly descended to a catalogue of those
virtues that gave Mary the right to be alive. And in what hope? That Elijah
and the others would nod their heads solemnly and say, at least, "Well,
she's all right -- but the others!"
And I looked again at the young faces around the table, and looked back at Elijah, who was saying that no people in history had ever been respected who had not owned their land. And the table said, "Yes, that's right." I could not deny the truth of this statement. For everyone else has, is, a nation, with a specific location and a flag -- even, these days, the Jew. It is only "the so-called American Negro" who remains trapped, disinherited, and despised, in a nation that has kept him in bondage for nearly four hundred
-- 73 --
years and is still unable to recognize him as a human being. And the Black Muslims,
along with many people who are not Muslims, no longer wish for a recognition
so grudging and (should it ever be achieved) so tardy. Again, it cannot be denied
that this point of view is abundantly justified by American Negro history. It
is galling indeed to have stood so long, hat in hand, waiting for Americans
to grow up enough to realize that you do not threaten them. On the other hand,
how is the American Negro now to form himself into a separate nation? For this
-- and not only from the Muslim point of view -- would seem to be his only hope
of not perishing in the American backwater and being entirely and forever forgotten,
as though he had never existed at all and his travail had been for nothing.
Elijah's intensity and the bitter isolation and disaffection of these young men and the despair of the streets outside had caused me to glimpse dimly what may now seem to be a fantasy, although, in an age so fantastical, I would hesitate to say precisely what a fantasy is. Let us say that the Muslims were to achieve the possession of the six or seven states that they claim are owed to Negroes by the United States as "back payment" for slave labor. Clearly, the United States would never surrender this territory, on any
-- 74 --
terms whatever, unless it found it impossible, for whatever reason, to hold
it -- unless, that is, the United States were to be reduced as a world power,
exactly the way, and at the same degree of speed, that England has been forced
to relinquish her Empire. (It is simply not true -- and the state of her ex-colonies
proves this -- that England "always meant to go.") If the states were
Southern states -- and the Muslims seem to favor this -- then the borders of
a hostile Latin America would be raised, in effect, to, say, Maryland. Of the
American borders on the sea, one would face toward a powerless Europe and the
other toward an untrustworthy and non-white East, and on the North, after Canada,
there would be only Alaska, which is a Russian border. The effect of this would
be that the white people of the United States and Canada would find themselves
marooned on a hostile continent, with the rest of the white world probably unwilling
and certainly unable to come to their aid. All this is not, to my mind, the
most imminent of possibilities, but if I were a Muslim, this is the possibility
that I would find myself holding in the center of my mind, and driving toward.
And if I were a Muslim, I would not hesitate to utilize -- or, indeed, to exacerbate
-- the social and spiritual discontent that reigns here, for, at the very worst,
I would merely have contributed to
-- 75 --
the destruction of a house I hated, and it would not matter if I perished, too.
One has been perishing here so long!
And what were they thinking around the table? "I've come," said Elijah, "to give you something which can never be taken away from you." How solemn the table became then, and how great a light rose in the dark faces! This is the message that has spread through streets and tenements and prisons, through the narcotics wards, and past the filth and sadism of mental hospitals to a people from whom everything has been taken away, including, most crucially, their sense of their own worth. People cannot live without this sense; they will do anything whatever to regain it. This is why the most dangerous creation of any soicety is that man who has nothing to lose. You do not need ten such men -- one will do. And Elijah, I should imagine, has had nothing to lose since the day he saw his father's blood rush out -- rush down, and splash, so the legend has it, down through the leaves of a tree, on him. But neither did the other men around the table have anything to lose. "Return to your true religion," Elijah has written. "Throw off the chains of the slavemaster, the devil, and return to the fold. Stop drinking his alcohol, using his dope -- protect your women -- and forsake the filthy swine." I remembered
-- 76 --
my buddies of years ago, in the hallways, with their wine and their whiskey
and their tears; in hallways still, frozen on the needle; and my brother saying
to me once, "If Harlem didn't have so many churches and junkies, there'd
be blood flowing in the streets." Protect your women: a difficult thing
to do in a civilization sexually so pathetic that the white man's masculinity
depends on a denial of the masculinity of the blacks. Protect your women: in
a civilization that emasculates the male and abuses the female, and in which,
moreover, the male is forced to depend on the female's bread-winning power.
Protect your women: in the teeth of the white man's boast "We figure we're
doing you folks a favor by pumping some white blood into your kids," and
while facing the Southern shotgun and the Northern billy. Years ago, we used
to say, "Yes, I'm black, goddammit, and I'm beautiful!" -- in defiance,
into the void. But now -- now -- African kings and heroes have come into the
world, out of the past, the past that can now be put to the uses of power. And
black has become a beautiful color -- not because it is loved but because it
is feared. And this urgency on the part of American Negroes is not to be forgotten!
As they watch black men elsewhere rise, the promise held out, at last, that
they may walk the earth with the authority with which white men
-- 77 --
walk, protected by the power that white men shall have no longer, is enough,
and more than enough, to empty prisons and pull God down from Heaven. It has
happened before, many times, before color was invented, and the hope of Heaven
has always been a metaphor for the achievement of this particular state of grace.
The song says, "I know my robe's going to fit me well. I tried it on at
the gates of Hell."
It was time to leave, and we stood in the large living room, saying good night, with everything curiously and heavily unresolved. I could not help feeling that I had failed a test, in their eyes and in my own, or that I had failed to heed a warning. Elijah and I shook hands, and he asked me where I was going. Wherever it was, I would be driven there -- "because, when we invite someone here," he said, "we take the responsibility of protecting him from the white devils until he gets wherever it is he's going." I was, in fact, going to have a drink with several white devils on the other side of town. I confess that for a fraction of a second I hesitated to give the address -- the kind of address that in Chicago, as in all American cities, identified itself as a white address by virtue of its location. But I did give it, and Elijah and I walked out onto the steps, and one of the young men vanished to get the car. It was very strange to stand with Elijah for those few
-- 78 --
moments, facing those vivid, violent, so problematical streets. I felt very
close to him, and really wished to be able to love and honor him as a witness,
an ally, and a father. I felt that I knew something of his pain and his fury,
and, yes, even his beauty. Yet precisely because of the reality and the nature
of those streets -- because of what he conceived as his responsibility and what
I took to be mine -- we would always be strangers, and possibly, one day, enemies.
The car arrived -- a gleaming, metallic, grossly American blue -- and Elijah
and I shook hands and said good night once more. He walked into his mansion
and shut the door.
The driver and I started on our way through dark, murmuring -- and, at this hour, strangely beautiful -- Chicago, along the lake. We returned to the discussion of the land. How were we -- Negroes -- to get this land? I asked this of the dark boy who had said earlier, at the table, that the white man's actions proved him to be a devil. He spoke to me first of the Muslim temples that were being built, or were about to be built, in various parts of the United States, of the strength of the Muslim following, and of the amount of money that is annually at the disposal of Negroes -- something like twenty billion dollars. "That alone shows you how strong we are," he said. But,
-- 79 --
I persisted, cautiously, and in somewhat different terms, this twenty billion
dollars, or whatever it is, depends on the total economy of the United States.
What happens when the Negro is no longer a part of this economy? Leaving aside
the fact that in order for this to happen the economy of the United States will
itself have had to undergo radical and certainly disastrous changes, the American
Negro's spending power will obviously no longer be the same. On what, then,
will the economy of this separate nation be based? The boy gave me a rather
strange look. I said hurriedly, "I'm not saying it can't be done -- I just
want to know how it's to be done." I was thinking, In order for this to
happen, your entire frame of reference will have to change, and you will be
forced to surrender many things that you now scarcely know you have. I didn't
feel that the things I had in mind, such as the pseudo-elegant heap of tin in
which we were riding, had any very great value. But life would be very different
without them, and I wondered if he had thought of this.
How can one, however, dream of power in any other terms than in the symbols of power? The boy could see that freedom depended on the possession of land; he was persuaded that, in one way or another, Negroes must achieve this possession. In the meantime,
-- 80 --
he could walk the streets and fear nothing, because there were millions like
him, coming soon, now, to power. He was held together, in short, by a dream
-- though it is just as well to remember that some dreams come true -- and was
united with his "brothers" on the basis of their color. Perhaps one
cannot ask for more. People always seem to band together in accordance to a
principle that has nothing to do with love, a principle that releases them from
personal responsibility.
Yet I could have hoped that the Muslim movement had been able to inculcate in the demoralized Negro population a truer and more individual sense of its own worth, so that Negroes in the Northern ghettos could begin, in concrete terms, and at whatever price, to change their situation. But in order to change a situation one has first to see it for what it is: in the present case, to accept the fact, whatever one does with it thereafter, that the Negro has been formed by this nation, for better or for worse, and does not belong to any other -- not to Africa, and certainly not to Islam. The paradox -- and a fearful paradox it is -- is that the American Negro can have no future anywhere, on any continent, as long as he is unwilling to accept his past. To accept one's past -- one's history -- is not the same thing as drowning in
-- 81 --
it; it is learning how to use it. An invented past can never be used; it cracks
and crumbles under the pressures of life like clay in a season of drought. How
can the American Negro's past be used? The unprecedented price demanded -- and
at this embattled hour of the world's history -- is the transcendence of the
realities of color, of nations, and of altars.
"Anyway," the boy said suddenly, after a very long silence, "things won't ever again be the way they used to be. I know that."
And so we arrived in enemy territory, and they set me down at the enemy's door.
NO ONE SEEMS to know where the Nation of Islam gets its money. A vast amount, of course, is contributed by Negroes, but there are rumors to the effect that people like Birchites and certain Texas oil millionaires look with favor on the movement. I have no way of knowing whether there is any truth to the rumors, though since these people make such a point of keeping the races separate, I wouldn't be surprised if for this smoke there was some fire. In any case, during a recent Muslim rally, George Lincoln Rockwell, the chief of the American Nazi party, made a point of contributing about
-- 82 --
twenty dollars to the cause, and he and Malcolm X decided that, racially speaking,
anyway, they were in complete agreement. The glorification of one race and the
consequent debasement of another -- or others -- always has been and always
will be a recipe for murder. There is no way around this. If one is permitted
to treat any group of people with special disfavor because of their race or
the color of their skin, there is no limit to what one will force them to endure,
and, since the entire race has been mysteriously indicted, no reason not to
attempt to destroy it root and branch. This is precisely what the Nazis attempted.
Their only originality lay in the means they used. It is scarcely worthwhile
to attempt remembering how many times the sun has looked down on the slaughter
of the innocents. I am very much concerned that American Negroes achieve their
freedom here in the United States. But I am also concerned for their dignity,
for the health of their souls, and must oppose any attempt that Negroes may
make to do to others what has been done to them. I think I know -- we see it
around us every day -- the spiritual wasteland to which that road leads. It
is so simple a fact and one that is so hard, apparently, to grasp: Whoever debases
others is debasing himself. That is not a mystical statement but a most realistic
one, which is proved by the
-- 83 --
eyes of any Alabama sheriff -- and I would not like to see Negroes ever arrive
at so wretched a condition.
Now, it is extremely unlikely that Negroes will ever rise to power in the United States, because they are only approximately a ninth of this nation. They are not in the position of the Africans, who are attempting to reclaim their land and break the colonial yoke and recover from the colonial experience. The Negro situation is dangerous in a different way, both for the Negro qua Negro and for the country of which he forms so troubled and troubling a part. The American Negro is a unique creation; he has no counterpart anywhere, and no predecessors. The Muslims react to this fact by referring to the Negro as "the so-called American Negro" and substituting for the names inherited from slavery the letter "X." It is a fact that every American Negro bears a name that originally belonged to the white man whose chattel he was. I am called Baldwin because I was either sold by my African tribe or kidnapped out of it into the hands of a white Christian named Baldwin, who forced me to kneel at the foot of the cross. I am, then, both visibly and legally the descendant of slaves in a white, Protestant country, and this is what it means to be an American Negro, this is who he is -- a kidnapped pagan, who was sold like an animal and treated like
-- 84 --
one, who was once defined by the American Constitution as "three-fifths"
of a man, and who, according to the Dred Scott decision, had no rights that
a white man was bound to respect. And today, a hundred years after his technical
emancipation, he remains -- with the possible exception of the American Indian
-- the most despised creature in his country. Now, there is simply no possibility
of a real change in the Negro's situation without the most radical and far-reaching
changes in the American political and social structure. And it is clear that
white Americans are not simply unwilling to effect these changes; they are,
in the main, so slothful have they become, unable even to envision them. It
must be added that the Negro himself no longer believes in the good faith of
white Americans -- if, indeed, he ever could have. What the Negro has discovered,
and on an international level, is that power to intimidate which he has always
had privately but hitherto could manipulate only privately -- for private ends
often, for limited ends always. And therefore when the country speaks of a "new"
Negro, which it has been doing every hour on the hour for decades, it is not
really referring to a change in the Negro, which, in any case, it is quite incapable
of assessing, but only to a new difficulty in keeping him in his place, to the
fact that it encounters
-- 85 --
him (again! again!) barring yet another door to its spiritual and social ease.
This is probably, hard and odd as it may sound, the most important thing that
one human being can do for another -- it is certainly one of the most important
things; hence the torment and necessity of love -- and this is the enormous
contribution that the Negro has made to this otherwise shapeless and undiscovered
country. Consequently, white Americans are in nothing more deluded than in supposing
that Negroes could ever have imagined that white people would "give"
them anything. It is rare indeed that people give. Most people guard and keep;
they suppose that it is they themselves and what they identify with themselves
that they are guarding and keeping, whereas what they are actually guarding
and keeping is their system of reality and what they assume themselves to be.
One can give nothing whatever without giving oneself -- that is to say, risking
oneself. If one cannot risk oneself, then one is simply incapable of giving.
And, after all, one can give freedom only by setting someone free. This, in
the case of the Negro, the American republic has never become sufficiently mature
to do. White Americans have contented themselves with gestures that are now
described as "tokenism." For hard example, white Americans congratulate
themselves on the 1954
-- 86 --
Supreme Court decision outlawing segregation in the schools; they suppose, in
spite of the mountain of evidence that has since accumulated to the contrary,
that this was proof of a change of heart -- or, as they like to say, progress.
Perhaps. It all depends on how one reads the word "progress." Most
of the Negroes I know do not believe that this immense concession would ever
have been made if it had not been for the competition of the Cold War, and the
fact that Africa was clearly liberating herself and therefore had, for political
reasons, to be wooed by the descendants of her former masters. Had it been a
matter of love or justice, the 1954 decision would surely have occurred sooner;
were it not for the realities of power in this difficult era, it might very
well not have occurred yet. This seems an extremely harsh way of stating the
case -- ungrateful, as it were -- but the evidence that supports this way of
stating it is not easily refuted. I myself do not think that it can be refuted
at all. In any event, the sloppy and fatuous nature of American good will can
never be relied upon to deal with hard problems. These have been dealt with,
when they have been dealt with at all, out of necessity -- and in political
terms, anyway, necessity means concessions made in order to stay on top. I think
this is a fact, which it serves no purpose to deny, but, whether it is a
-- 87 --
fact or not, this is what the black population of the world, including black
Americans, really believe. The word "independence" in Africa and the
word "integration" here are almost equally meaningless; that is, Europe
has not yet left Africa, and black men here are not yet free. And both of these
last statements are undeniable facts, related facts, containing the gravest
implications for us all. The Negroes of this country may never be able to rise
to power, but they are very well placed indeed to precipitate chaos and ring
down the curtain on the American dream.
This has everything to do, of course, with the nature of that dream and with the fact that we Americans, of whatever color, do not dare examine it and are far from having made it a reality. There are too many things we do not wish to know about ourselves. People are not, for example, terribly anxious to be equal (equal, after all, to what and to whom?) but they love the idea of being superior. And this human truth has an especially grinding force here, where identity is almost impossible to achieve and people are perpetually attempting to find their feet on the shifting sands of status. (Consider the history of labor in a country in which, spiritually speaking, there are no workers, only candidates for the hand of the boss's daughter.) Furthermore, I have met only a very few
-- 88 --
people -- and most of these were not Americans -- who had any real desire to
be free. Freedom is hard to bear. It can be objected that I am speaking of political
freedom in spiritual terms, but the political institutions of any nation are
always menaced and are ultimately controlled by the spiritual state of that
nation. We are controlled here by our confusion, far more than we know, and
the American dream has therefore become something much more closely resembling
a nightmare, on the private, domestic, and international levels. Privately,
we cannot stand our lives and dare not examine them; domestically, we take no
responsibility for (and no pride in) what goes on in our country; and, internationally,
for many millions of people, we are an unmitigated disaster. Whoever doubts
this last statement has only to open his ears, his heart, his mind, to the testimony
of -- for example -- any Cuban peasant or any Spanish poet, and ask himself
what he would feel about us if he were the victim of our performance in pre-Castro
Cuba or in Spain. We defend our curious role in Spain by referring to the Russian
menace and the necessity of protecting the free world. It has not occurred to
us that we have simply been mesmerized by Russia, and that the only real advantage
Russia has in what we think of as a struggle between the East and the West is
the
-- 89 --
moral history of the Western world. Russia's secret weapon is the bewilderment
and despair and hunger of millions of people of whose existence we are scarcely
aware. The Russian Communists are not in the least concerned about these people.
But our ignorance and indecision have had the effect, if not of delivering them
into Russian hands, of plunging them very deeply in the Russian shadow, for
which effect -- and it is hard to blame them -- the most articulate among them,
and the most oppressed as well, distrust us all the more. Our power and our
fear of change help bind these people to their misery and bewilderment, and
insofar as they find this state intolerable we are intolerably menaced. For
if they find their state intolerable, but are too heavily oppressed to change
it, they are simply pawns in the hands of larger powers, which, in such a context,
are always unscrupulous, and when, eventually, they do change their situation
-- as in Cuba -- we are menaced more than ever, by the vacuum that succeeds
all violent upheavals. We should certainly know by now that it is one thing
to overthrow a dictator or repel an invader and quite another thing really to
achieve a revolution. Time and time and time again, the people discover that
they have merely betrayed themselves into the hands of yet another Pharaoh,
who, since he
-- 90 --
was necessary to put the broken country together, will not let them go. Perhaps,
people being the conundrums that they are, and having so little desire to shoulder
the burden of their lives, this is what will always happen. But at the bottom
of my heart I do not believe this. I think that people can be better than that,
and I know that people can be better than they are. We are capable of bearing
a great burden, once we discover that the burden is reality and arrive where
reality is. Anyway, the point here is that we are living in an age of revolution,
whether we will or no, and that America is the only Western nation with both
the power and, as I hope to suggest, the experience that may help to make these
revolutions real and minimize the human damage. Any attempt we make to oppose
these outbursts of energy is tantamount to signing our death warrant.
Behind what we think of as the Russian menace lies what we do not wish to face, and what white Americans do not face when they regard a Negro: reality -- the fact that life is tragic. Life is tragic simply because the earth turns and the sun inexorably rises and sets, and one day, for each of us, the sun will go down for the last, last time. Perhaps the whole root of our trouble, the human trouble, is that we will sacrifice all the beauty of our lives, will imprison ourselves
-- 91 --
in totems, taboos, crosses, blood sacrifices, steeples, mosques, races, armies,
flags, nations, in order to deny the fact of death, which is the only fact we
have. It seems to me that one ought to rejoice in the fact of death -- ought
to decide, indeed, to earn one's death by confronting with passion the conundrum
of life. One is responsible to life: It is the small beacon in that terrifying
darkness from which we come and to which we shall return. One must negotiate
this passage as nobly as possible, for the sake of those who are coming after
us. But white Americans do not believe in death, and this is why the darkness
of my skin so intimidates them. And this is also why the presence of the Negro
in this country can bring about its destruction. It is the responsibility of
free men to trust and to celebrate what is constant -- birth, struggle, and
death are constant, and so is love, though we may not always think so -- and
to apprehend the nature of change, to be able and willing to change. I speak
of change not on the surface but in the depths -- change in the sense of renewal.
But renewal becomes impossible if one supposes things to be constant that are
not -- safety, for example, or money, or power. One clings then to chimeras,
by which one can only be betrayed, and the entire hope -- the entire possibility
-- of freedom disappears. And by destruction I mean
-- 92 --
precisely the abdication by Americans of any effort really to be free. The Negro
can precipitate this abdication because white Americans have never, in all their
long history, been able to look on him as a man like themselves. This point
need not be labored; it is proved over and over again by the Negro's continuing
position here, and his indescribable struggle to defeat the stratagems that
white Americans have used, and use, to deny him his humanity. America could
have used in other ways the energy that both groups have expended in this conflict.
America, of all the Western nations, has been best placed to prove the uselessness
and the obsolescence of the concept of color. But it has not dared to accept
this opportunity, or even to conceive of it as an opportunity. White Americans
have thought of it as their shame, and have envied those more civilized and
elegant European nations that were untroubled by the presence of black men on
their shores. This is because white Americans have supposed "Europe"
and "civilization" to be synonyms -- which they are not -- and have
been distrustful of other standards and other sources of vitality, especially
those produced in America itself, and have attempted to behave in all matters
as though what was east for Europe was also east for them. What it comes to
is that if we, who can scarcely
-- 93 --
be considered a white nation, persist in thinking of ourselves as one, we condemn
ourselves, with the truly white nations, to sterility and decay, whereas if
we could accept ourselves as we are, we might bring new life to the Western
achievements, and transform them. The price of this transformation is the unconditional
freedom of the Negro; it is not too much to say that he, who has been so long
rejected, must now be embraced, and at no matter what psychic or social risk.
He is the key figure in his country, and the American future is precisely as
bright or as dark as his. And the Negro recognizes this, in a negative way.
Hence the question: Do I really want to be integrated into a burning house?
White Americans find it as difficult as white people elsewhere do to divest themselves of the notion that they are in possession of some intrinsic value that black people need, or want. And this assumption -- which, for example, makes the solution to the Negro problem depend on the speed with which Negroes accept and adopt white standards -- is revealed in all kinds of striking ways, from Bobby Kennedy's assurance that a Negro can become President in forty years to the unfortunate tone of warm congratulation with which so many liberals address their Negro equals. It is the Negro, of course, who is presumed to have
-- 94 --
become equal -- an achievement that not only proves the comforting fact that
perseverance has no color but also overwhelmingly corroborates the white man's
sense of his own value. Alas, this value can scarcely be corroborated in any
other way; there is certainly little enough in the white man's public or private
life that one should desire to imitate. White men, at the bottom of their hearts,
know this. Therefore, a vast amount of the energy that goes into what we call
the Negro problem is produced by the white man's profound desire not to be judged
by those who are not white, not to be seen as he is, and at the same time a
vast amount of the white anguish is rooted in the white man's equally profound
need to be seen as he is, to be released from the tyranny of his mirror. All
of us know, whether or not we are able to admit it, that mirrors can only lie,
that death by drowning is all that awaits one there. It is for this reason that
love is so desperately sought and so cunningly avoided. Love takes off the masks
that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the
word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of
being, or a state of grace -- not in the infantile American sense of being made
happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth. And
I submit, then, that the racial tensions
-- 95 --
that menace Americans today have little to do with real antipathy -- on the
contrary, indeed -- and are involved only symbolically with color. These tensions
are rooted in the very same depths as those from which love springs, or murder.
The white man's unadmitted -- and apparently, to him, unspeakable -- private
fears and longings are projected onto the Negro. The only way he can be released
from the Negro's tyrannical power over him is to consent, in effect, to become
black himself, to become a part of that suffering and dancing country that he
now watches wistfully from the heights of his lonely power and, armed with spiritual
traveller's checks, visits surreptitiously after dark. How can one respect,
let alone adopt, the values of a people who do not, on any level whatever, live
the way they say they do, or the way they say they should? I cannot accept the
proposition that the four-hundred-year travail of the American Negro should
result merely in his attainment of the present level of the American civilization.
I am far from convinced that being released from the African witch doctor was
worthwhile if I am now -- in order to support the moral contradictions and the
spiritual aridity of my life -- expected to become dependent on the American
psychiatrist. It is a bargain I refuse. The only thing white people have that
black
-- 96 --
people need, or should want, is power -- and no one holds power forever. White
people cannot, in the generality, be taken as models of how to live. Rather,
the white man is himself in sore need of new standards, which will release him
from his confusion and place him once again in fruitful communion with the depths
of his own being. And I repeat: The price of the liberation of the white people
is the liberation of the blacks -- the total liberation, in the cities, in the
towns, before the law, and in the mind. Why, for example -- especially knowing
the family as I do -- I should want to marry your sister is a great mystery
to me. But your sister and I have every right to marry if we wish to, and no
one has the right to stop us. If she cannot raise me to her level, perhaps I
can raise her to mine.
In short, we, the black and the white, deeply need each other here if we are really to become a nation -- if we are really, that is, to achieve our identity, our maturity, as men and women. To create one nation has proved to be a hideously difficult task; there is certainly no need now to create two, one black and one white. But white men with far more political power than that possessed by the Nation of Islam movement have been advocating exactly this, in effect, for generations. If this sentiment is honored when it falls from
-- 97 --
the lips of Senator Byrd, then there is no reason it should not be honored when
it falls from the lips of Malcolm X. And any Congressional committee wishing
to investigate the latter must also be willing to investigate the former. They
are expressing exactly the same sentiments and represent exactly the same danger.
There is absolutely no reason to suppose that white people are better equipped
to frame the laws by which I am to be governed than I am. It is entirely unacceptable
that I should have no voice in the political affairs of my own country, for
I am not a ward of America; I am one of the first Americans to arrive on these
shores.
This past, the Negro's past, of rope, fire, torture, castratio